View Post Evaluation
Jane Li
25
The number is very different from expected because the timing of the event is very bad. First of all, it was during week 4 (2 weeks) after our recruitment processes and many had a midterm that day. Also it was right after another big event of ours that some people were confused about what the difference were. Next time for the GBM, we will time it better and advertise better.
349.92
NA
The purpose of this event was to introduce to UCSD students what events/projects CES will be hosting the rest of this quarter and Winter quarter.
We consider this event to be ok. There were a lot less attendance than expected, but overall the vibe was good.
The most valuable resource for this event is AS funding because this event didn't really need other materials and the event occurs during dinner time, so having AS funding to provide food makes the attendees much more happy and willing to participate.
There were none.
We should improve the ice breaker round of the event. We did guess the words with yes or no questions. The words were way too hard and specific, so they were need to be changed if we want to play the game again.
We will need to advertise much more earlier and more frequently. We only posted it two weeks before and never after, so we would need to advertise at one week and the day before for other events.
NA